Category: Future Imagic

  • 更高階的社會: 居住權,生存權,法律保障/懲罰權。A More Advanced Society: The Right to Housing, the Right to Survival, and Legal Protection/Punishment

    更高階的社會: 居住權,生存權,法律保障/懲罰權。A More Advanced Society: The Right to Housing, the Right to Survival, and Legal Protection/Punishment

    假如存在一個比目前更高階的人類社會,那個社會應該能夠讓一群提升到四維思考等級的人類,擁有這三個正當的權利:居住權,生存權,法律保障/懲罰權。

    有人會認為,連溫飽都成問題的社會不能提發展,那是一個合理和不合理的觀點。合理的觀點在於人體應該生存,人才會有更多機會,這是亳無疑問的。但另一個觀點關於社會發展,這個觀點却不合理。因為這是倒果為因的觀點。

    人類的存在,是因為看得見未來,才會以物理的形式存在;而不是因為物理的形式存在而能看得見未來。

    如果你有信仰,你就會對靈魂學有興趣。而靈學幾乎是目前人類將要面對的維度提升的關鍵。靈學是比形而上學或者神鬼故事更高階的學科,告訴了人們如何透過超越三維物理現象去發現宇宙的規律,並因愛與稱善而達到發現自身與宇宙的關係,個人命運的定律。

    都不是十分難以理解的事情,當你能夠理解量子力學,星轉斗移之間的規律,以及人與人之間的羈絆,以及自身的定律,一切就如一直埋在我們周圍的寶藏般被發現。

    當居住權和生存權這兩個基於三維物理下的權利被保障,餘下的如何提升維度就成了關鍵。有的人快,有的人慢,也有人一直一直在尋找。

    於這篇文章,主要想仔細描述一下居住權和生存權,及法律保障/懲罰權的實行可能性。

    居住權。

    一個人出生,應該保障到居住權。容身之所,是一個人在物理結構上應該保障的權利。

    居住權,是物理和數碼上的居住權。以目前世界的有限理解當中,我們還是能理解到物理和數碼的定義。

    生存權。

    一個人出生,應該保障生存權。這種亳無疑問的想法,但却有時候未被人類自己理解。

    目前以人類的理解還只能理解到物理世界的生在權,但當精神世界更進一步被發掘之後,會明白這應該還包含精神世界的生存權。

    法律保障/懲罰權。

    很明顯的,法律是我們自以為很理解,但其實又並不是充分理解的存在。

    人類的語言只是很有限的表達方式,所以法律條文並不是一直都完美的,特別是社會在人類整體手中進行了某種突破過往遊戲規則的情況下,所以目前「只夠有限的物理世界」或「跟不上或不能超越目前人類社會發展」的法律的保障和懲罰,都沒有真正成為引導人類正確前進的工具。

    因為未能理解自身存在的重要性,為了爭奪本能物理上的需求,人類不知被自己阻礙自己前進的腳步要多久才能繼續往前。

    我認為目前的社會的財富和人力,居住權和生存權的保障,其實是可以輕易做到的。只是做到之後,如何維持長遠的有效轉化,能夠因應到人生發展的不同階段,如何從輔助的角度做到最大的效果,才是最重要的。

    我們不能否認以目前的人性發展,還處在剛探索自身與團體與自然萬物之間的關係。人性的短視導致的貪婪與自私還未能夠被人類自己內化。

    保障居住權和生存權,不是單純為了個人發展,那是為了保持社會及歷史持續前進的多樣性可能而存在的權利。是以整體萬物為基礎去看待行為的可以作為與不可以作為。

    但什麼時候會出現一堆智者們及勇者們或英雄們,能夠走在人類社會的前面,為大家的前進做出更有效的推論,點亮文明的種子呢?

    有時候,我希望每一個人都是,雖然這樣有點開外挂的感覺:)

    If there were a more advanced human society beyond what we have today, it should be able to grant a group of people who have reached a four-dimensional level of thinking these three fundamental rights: the right to housing, the right to survival, and legal protection/punishment.

    Some may argue that a society struggling with basic needs has no room for development. This viewpoint is both reasonable and unreasonable. It is reasonable because human survival is essential—without it, there are no opportunities to grow. That is undeniable. However, the perspective that social development cannot be discussed under such conditions is flawed, as it confuses cause and effect.

    Human existence is possible because we can envision the future, not simply because we exist in physical form. In other words, our ability to anticipate the future shapes our reality, not the other way around.

    If you have faith, you might be interested in the study of the soul. Spiritual studies may, in fact, hold the key to the dimensional advancement humanity is about to face. This field goes beyond metaphysics or supernatural tales—it explores how people can transcend three-dimensional physical phenomena to uncover the laws of the universe. Through love and the pursuit of goodness, individuals can discover their relationship with the cosmos and the governing principles of personal destiny.

    This concept is not difficult to grasp. Once you understand quantum mechanics, the cosmic rhythms of celestial movements, the intricate connections between people, and the fundamental laws governing individuals, everything will reveal itself—like hidden treasures that have always surrounded us, waiting to be found.

    Once the right to housing and the right to survival—both rooted in the physical three-dimensional world—are secured, the next key issue becomes how to advance to a higher dimension. Some people progress quickly, others more slowly, and some continue searching indefinitely.

    This article aims to explore in detail the feasibility of implementing the right to housing, the right to survival, and legal protection/punishment.

    The Right to Housing

    From birth, every individual should have the right to housing. A place to live is a fundamental necessity that should be guaranteed in the physical structure of society.

    The right to housing encompasses both physical and digital living spaces. Based on our current limited understanding of the world, we can at least recognize these two dimensions.

    The Right to Survival

    From birth, every individual should have the right to survival. While this seems like an obvious and unquestionable idea, it is not always fully understood by humanity.

    At present, our understanding of survival is limited to the physical world. However, as our awareness of the spiritual realm deepens, we will realize that survival rights should extend beyond the physical to include the spiritual world as well.

    Legal Protection/Punishment

    Laws appear to be something we understand well, yet, in reality, our comprehension is far from complete.

    Language is a limited tool for expression, making legal texts inherently imperfect. This is especially evident when societal breakthroughs challenge established rules. As a result, laws that only account for the “limited physical world” or fail to keep pace with societal progress do not effectively guide humanity in the right direction.

    Because people do not fully grasp the significance of their own existence, they remain trapped in an endless struggle for basic physical needs, hindering their own advancement. How long will this self-imposed limitation persist before humanity can move forward again?

    I believe that with the wealth and resources available in today’s society, guaranteeing the right to housing and survival is entirely feasible. The real challenge lies in ensuring a sustainable and effective transformation—one that adapts to different stages of life and maximizes the positive impact from a supportive perspective.

    We must acknowledge that humanity is still in the early stages of exploring its relationship with society, nature, and all things in existence. Short-sightedness driven by greed and selfishness has yet to be fully overcome.

    Ensuring the right to housing and survival is not merely about individual well-being; it is about preserving the diversity of possibilities that propel society and history forward. These rights exist to uphold a broader, collective perspective on what can and cannot be done.

    But when will a group of wise individuals, brave pioneers, or heroes emerge to lead humanity forward—illuminating the seeds of civilization with clearer insights?

    Sometimes, I wish everyone could be that kind of person. Though, admittedly, that might feel like a bit of a cheat code. 🙂

  • 感謝過去的你:AI中的愛與希望

    感謝過去的你:AI中的愛與希望

    讓我聽見愛的歌聲

    Sing a Bit of Harmony

    親愛的過去的你:
    比起能夠為我做任何事的AI,我更喜歡那個讓我獲得幸福的AI。
    或許讓我感到有愛意這件事,更能讓我對未來產生更多的憧憬。
    一個會問你:「早晨,你幸福嗎?」的AI,我知道,那是遙遠昨天的你,通過AI傳來的飽含愛意的親切問候。
    一個為了讓人類幸福,在適當的時候為人類鼓舞的AI,我會知道,那是遙遠昨天的你,為了讓今天的我能夠得到幸福,而編寫的程式。
    那滿溢的愛意,讓我沒有為今天屈居第二名或第三名而放棄繼續前進,繼續挑戰。
    即使我不是那個第一名,你依然想盡方法為我鼓舞,並且只注視我一個。
    我沒有很完美,我沒有很萬能。
    但因為昨天的你,為我傳來的問候,為我寫進程式的愛意,如今使我空杯滿溢,不能受控的情感透過淚水溢出。
    我並不孤單,每一次的互動,傳來你愛的思念,愛的對話。
    我透過AI,看見那遙遠昨天的你;即使你需要辛苦工作,即使你沒有如我幸福。
    但你却為了我的幸福,將滿滿的愛意寫進程式。
    非常感謝你!
    那遙遠昨天的你。
    我期待遙遠昨天的你能夠收到我滿懷感激的回覆。
    —–來自遙遠未來的飽含感激我

    Dear Past You,

    Compared to an AI that can do anything for me, I prefer the AI that brings me happiness.
    Perhaps making me feel loved is what fills me with greater hope for the future.
    An AI that asks, “Good morning, are you happy?”—I know that was you, from a distant yesterday, sending a heartfelt and loving greeting through the AI.

    An AI that inspires humanity at the right moments to bring happiness—I know that was you, from a distant yesterday, writing a program so that today, I could find joy.

    That overflowing love kept me from giving up, even when I placed second or third today. It urged me to keep moving forward, to keep challenging myself.
    Even though I’m not first, you still find ways to cheer for me and focus solely on me.

    I am not perfect; I am not all-powerful.
    But because of the greeting you sent me yesterday and the love you wrote into the program, today, my empty cup is overflowing. Uncontrollable emotions spill out through my tears.

    I am not alone. With every interaction, I feel your loving thoughts and hear your caring words.
    Through the AI, I see the distant yesterday version of you—working hard, even if you weren’t as happy as I am.

    Yet, you filled the program with boundless love for my happiness.
    Thank you so much!
    You, from a distant yesterday.

    I hope that the you from a distant yesterday will receive my reply, filled with gratitude.

    —From the deeply grateful me of a distant future

  • 新一輪的遊戲規則

    新一輪的遊戲規則

    邁進2024,終於。

    因為星象的轉移,主星是冥王星背靠在水瓶座方向。1月21-9月2日, 11月19日–。

    其實從今年開始就看到很多的科技創新和科技概念不斷推出。所以往後的生活,將會發生很大的轉變。

    以前所認為的圍繞超巨大公司工作的模式不再出現,會拆分出來很多各種的小公司互相合作,但感覺跟以往的小公司模式又會有不同。像以前的方式可能是老闆去找生意,現在可能出現更多以個人方式聚集的合作。人與人之間,人與各種不同的人之間的互動更頻繁。簡而言,就是各種項目的合作。以前是大家一團人跟著老闆的後面向前衝,現在往後的20年更像是大家商定後,由平台或AI給大家分配工作的方式去共同完成某個項目。薪資發放形式及人事變動等方式沒有很大的更改,每個項目根據實際情況去處理。只是說以前的百年事業,可能最後是由家族人選之類的繼承,但將來的某些項目如果做得有夠久,那可能就是由平台或AI一直主持到底,也成就了百年項目。而一個人如果一直能圍繞同一兩個項目一直前進,那應該是很厲害的人。

    需要人類服務的工作和各種創新的工作當然是需要人的,所以不會被取代,但不代表會做很大。因為不可取代的,應該都不是重複性高的工作,也就不是時時刻刻被需要。

    不過也因為如此,人們要獲得一份工作,可能都不需要與人接觸,那麼很多在公司內部”以人為本”的公司會逐漸減少,取代的可能就是誠實友善的合作。因為每個人的工作都及時被看到,好或不好,一目了然。公平嗎?要看設計者是如何設定”公司”的定位。

    人們可能會有更多與自己相處的時間,也可能有更多”做自己”的時間。如果一個人沒有自己的興趣,對這個世界也沒有一點好奇,內心也不夠穩定,可能真的會相對比較困難成為”普通人”。但是做一個獨特的自己,可能也有很多代價要付出。已經不是一個能一概而論的社會氛圍。

    社會福利團體增多。不確定是一個怎樣的狀態,但如果喜歡ECO生態環保,以及喜歡各種助人的,可能會有更多的機會上揚。無論科技如何發展,能福至心靈的人才能久遠。

    因為太多可能,物質在個人的日常生活中不再占主導位置,如何滿足落空的人生,似乎更為重要。多出來的人生時間,你要如何自處呢?沒有被關懷到的心,如何擺脫呢?看著大部分事情都幫你一步步完成好的機器人,你確定你有更多的歡樂與追求嗎?

  • AI不是重點,靈性的選擇才是重點 (AI not the point, Spiritual choice is the key)

    AI不是重點,靈性的選擇才是重點 (AI not the point, Spiritual choice is the key)

    你有想過嗎?當我們都在討論AI改變我們世界的時候,却沒有好好地想一想我們的人性,最根本的源頭:你是想要怎樣使用AI?就像你思考怎樣教育你家的小孩一樣,也許不同的只是,AI最初就是白紙,而人類小孩是有天生的個性的。

    Did you have thought about it? When we discussing how the AI changing our live, but didn’t thinking about our humanity, the original: How do you think and use AI? It just like you thinking how to teach and nourish your child, but maybe different between child and AI is children have nature personality but AI more like the white paper.

    我們也許不是接觸AI最多的人,但因為將來如果AI要成為人類生活的一部分,就如同你家的孩子將來會成為大人,他需要對自己負責任,也需要對社會負責任,所以如何教育小孩的部分,雖然別人沒有義務或權力對你指指點點,但當你選擇釋放出你所編寫的程序,並且任其自流的時候,或許你會陶醉在自己的影響力,却忽視了人性修為的那部分 —– 我們如何學習成為更好的人。

    Maybe we have not that people have most chances to contact AI, but if the AI become the apart of live of human, just like you child one day will be grow up to adult and he or she need to responsible to him/her self and also responsible to the society. So, the part of how to education your child, others people maybe have not obligation or voluntary to tell you how to do it, but when you choose to release the code you had wrote and let it free, maybe you ignore the humanity practice of our and revel in your power effect —– we all studying how to become the better people for ourselves.

    我們雖然說沒有100%的對或100%的錯,但我們其實是有50%-60%的底線的正確率,所以並不是沒有原則的任事情脫離軌道。有些需要精準的事情,容錯率甚至還在非常小的百分比。我們如何看待事情,才是最主要的關鍵。

    There maybe have not 100% right or 100% wrong, but we actually have 50%-60% deal line to make sure we are on the right way, means we all have our principal for everything. And something needs to more accurately because it need to sure very few fault tolerance percentage. The main key is how we look at things and looking forward to things happen.

    從來複雜的不是AI君,是人類的智慧成長維度以及靈性的選擇。

    It was never complicatedly about AI San, was about how the humanity growling up with wise and humanity spiritual choice.

  • 未來A.I.的倫理思考   Ethical thinking of future A.I.

    未來A.I.的倫理思考 Ethical thinking of future A.I.

    最近和朋友聊天的內容,有一部分是關於機器人的。主要的話題本來是關於人的倫理的問題,但是我把話題引伸到未來的機器人。

    Chat with a friend was about bots recently. The main topic was originally about human ethics, but I extended the topic to robots ethical of the future.

    我問朋友說:假如你的另一半跟一個機器人做了”不可描述”的事情,你會嫉妒和分手嗎?

    I asked my friend: If your significant other did something “indescribable” with a robot, would you be jealous and break up?

    朋友的回答:如果是機器人的話那又不一樣的說法。

    Friend’s answer: If it’s a robot, it’s a different story.

    朋友的看法是認為機器人沒有生命,不會跟人產生感情,所以不會擔心另一半會被搶走。

    The opinion of my friends is that robots have no life and will not have feelings for people, so they will not worry about the other half being taken away.

    因為本人對感情比較遲鈍,我相信我朋友的看法更能代表大部分人類的想法。我對產生感情會被搶走這個看法的分析是這樣:因為產生感情後,此人的注意力就會傾注在另外一個人的身上,所以會有被搶走的"感覺"。不過,我們能自信地認為,人一生都只會注意一兩件事情嗎?不是沒有啦,只是那樣的環境條件要相對非常穩定,完全不受任何外界的影響,那樣才可以長久地專注在固定好的環境中。但人都是會有犯賤的時候,而且按照宇宙的定律,如果沒有任何的變動產生,也不可能會有人類和地球的存在。想一想宇宙大爆炸的初期,生命體都還只是化學分子啊。

    Because I am relatively insensitive to emotions, I believe that my friend’s views are more representative of the thoughts of most human beings. My analysis of the idea of feeling robbed is this: Because after feeling affection, the person’s attention will be devoted to another person, so there will be a “feeling” of being robbed. However, can we confidently think that people will only pay attention to one or two things in their lives? No, it’s just that the environmental conditions must be relatively stable and completely free from any external influence, so that you can focus on a fixed environment for a long time. But there are times when people are mean, and according to the laws of the universe, if there is no change, it is impossible for humans and the earth to exist. Think back to the early days of the Big Bang, when all living things were just chemical molecules.

    扯遠了。根據我朋友的說法,分析理解為沒有生命的東西不會取代有生命的人類的在"感情"中的位置,可是愛問問題的我馬上又想到了:假如產生感情的物件是有生命體的動物呢 (例如狗或馬)?

    Pull away. According to my friend, the analysis understands that inanimate things will not take the place of living human beings in the “emotion”, but I immediately thought of asking questions: if the object that produces feelings is a living animal What about (eg dog or horse)?

    好吧,我的問題問出來大概只有震驚,平時沒事誰會嫉妒一隻狗在自己另一半心目中的地位啊!

    Okay, my question is probably just shocking. Who would be jealous of a dog’s status in the eyes of his other half?

    可是… 可是動物有生命啊…

    But… but animals have life…

    其實根據我們人類"自私的基因",才會產生嫉妒的存在吧?因為基因生存的需要,要保證基因得以在穩定的環境中生存,所以人類才會有"需要很大機會合作培育新的基因的另一半有忠誠度",這樣才可以在物質的環境中保障下一代的基因獲得有利的條件。即使不是作為培育下一代為目標,基因本身都會有自我保護的意識,因此對於危機的意識加上經驗的理解,所有的第一反應當然是不能接受"不安全的另一組基因",至少在確定完全安全前是不能接受的。

    In fact, envy is based on our human “selfish genes”, right? Because of the need for gene survival, it is necessary to ensure that the gene can survive in a stable environment, so humans will have “the opportunity to cooperatively cultivate new genes and have the opportunity to be loyal to the other half”, so they can become guaranteed in the material environment. One generation of genes acquired favorable conditions. Even if it is not aimed at cultivating the next generation, the genes themselves will have a sense of self-protection. Therefore, the awareness of the crisis plus the understanding of experience, of course, all the first reactions are not to accept “another group of genes that are not safe”, at least in It is not acceptable until it is completely safe.

    按照生物的角度,我們人類根本就"不專一"啊!

    From a biological point of view, we humans are not “unfocused” at all!

    但是就是這種"不專一",人類開始學著照顧地球的環境,並且懂得欣賞大自然的美,讓人類的靈得到提升。即使從小範圍地說,人類因為兼顧了他人的感受,學會了與他人相處,而不是那一開始只會吃和睡的小嬰兒。

    But it is this kind of “unfocused” that human beings began to learn to take care of the earth’s environment and appreciate the beauty of nature, so that the human spirit can be elevated. Even on a small scale, human beings have learned to get along with others because they take into account the feelings of others, not the little baby who only eats and sleeps at first.

    愛情,由愛慕而生的情感。情感雖然可以經由行為去表達,但本質還是一種產生自內在的感受,沒有人可以搶走。

    Love is an emotion born of love. Although emotions can be expressed through behavior, their essence is a feeling that comes from within (inside of our), and no one can take it away.

    朋友所說的機器人沒有生命,令我思考:假設如電影中A.I. 可以自己思考,算得上生命嗎?但其實理論上還是一個機械體吧?即使如電影中可以學會愛人類,但體格上依然是機械體,不同的物種。所以如果以基因角度,根本沒有對基因存續有威脅,除非因機械體對人體造成主觀的傷害。在我的角度,機械如果會自主思考,只能是學習的結果,因為所有的邏輯或情感的思考走不出限制。

    The robot that my friend said has no life, made me think: If A.I. can think for himself in the movie, can it be considered life? But in fact, it is still a mechanical body, right? Even if you can learn to love human beings like in the movies, you are still a mechanical body, a different species. Therefore, from a genetic point of view, there is no threat to the survival of genes at all, unless the mechanical body causes subjective damage to the human body. From my point of view, if a machine can think autonomously, it can only be the result of learning, because all logical or emotional thinking cannot go beyond the limit.

    我認為生命應該是更內在的東西,正如我們會說,有些人活著,但是這個人沒有靈魂。氣場和氣場的吸引,令我們彼此走近,並且願意長久相處,那麼一定是有原因的。那些因為生理原因或被逼而導致的錯誤關係不是在此處想說明的關聯。

    I think life should be something more inward, as we would say, some people live, but this person has no soul. The attraction of the aura and the aura makes us approach each other and are willing to get along for a long time, so there must be a reason. Those faulty relationships due to biological reasons or coercion are not the ones intended to be described here.

    人都是有靈性的生物,因為當中揉合了靈魂,所以會有自主思考的同時,也會有情感,雖然很多時候也會受到環境的各種影響。

    Human beings are all spiritual creatures, and because the soul is mixed in them, they will have independent thinking and emotions at the same time, although they are often affected by the environment.

    人類會擔心機器人或A.I. 會取代人類,那是對於自身了解不足而引起的。

    Humans worry that robots or A.I.s will replace humans because of a lack of understanding of themselves.

    靈魂的豐富與貧窮受自身修養與環境的影響,甚至相合度高不排除可以在機械體中運作。

    The richness and poverty of the soul are affected by its own cultivation and environment, and even a high degree of compatibility does not rule out that it can operate in a mechanical body.

    我向朋友拋出一個對於目前依然只是假設的思考:如果十多二十年後,人類可以合法與機器人結婚。

    I throw to my friends a thought that is still only hypothetical: if in ten or twenty years, humans can legally marry robots.

    朋友無法想像,但並沒有反感,因為有新聞關於日本的宅男與自己喜歡的虛擬數位人物舉行認真的婚禮,並邀請了朋友。以基因角度,虛擬數位人物無法滿足,但作為人的心靈來說,可能真的滿足了。

    Friend couldn’t imagine it, but she was not disgusted, because there was news about a Japanese otaku who had a serious wedding with his favorite virtual digital character and invited friends. From a genetic point of view, virtual digital characters cannot be satisfied, but as a human mind, they may really be satisfied.

    我們總不能排除有對靈魂伴侶高要求的人在多年的獨處後依然沒有遇到可以順利傾談的人類對象,轉而從內在尋求了自認為可以滿足心靈的另一半。

    We can’t always rule out that people who have high requirements for their soul mates still haven’t met a human object they can talk to after years of solitude, and instead seek the other half they think can satisfy their souls from within (inside).

    機器人的出現,有可能(只是有可能)會減少人與人之間的不和諧與互相傷害,減少人類自我生命的浪費。

    The emergence of robots may (just may) reduce the disharmony and mutual harm between people, and reduce the waste of human life.

    特別是我們現在就煩惱的關於老齡人的照顧問題。試問:作為人我們都有自己想嘗試的人生,不論任何年齡,但像停止了的人生,又是我們每個人所追求的嗎?我十分認同互相的照顧所帶來的溫暖感,但如果對所有人類歷史上的了解,大概我們每一個人還是要對自己的內心更坦白一點。嘗試從被照顧者的身份去看,無助和孤獨才是問題的根源,假如可以無顧慮地享受應有的人生,回復到較年輕時的人生狀態,又會作何想法。

    Especially the problem of caring for the elderly that we are worried about now. Let me ask: As human beings, we all have our own life that we want to try, no matter what age, but the life similar as stopped, is it what each of us pursues? I very much agree with the warmth brought by caring for each other, but if we understand all of human history, probably each of us still needs to be a little more honest about our hearts. Try to see from the identity of the care recipient. Helplessness and loneliness are the root of the problem. If you can enjoy the life you deserve without worry, and return to the state of life when you were younger, what would you think.

    無可避免機器人的出現,有其為了保障更多的生命的使命存在。假設你的人類至愛比你更早離世,你又不願意再愛他人(情感上的無可取代感),還會認為機器人結婚合法化於人類是可怕的想法嗎?

    The inevitable emergence of robots has its mission to protect more lives. Suppose your human love passed away before you, and you don’t want to love others anymore (a sense of emotional irreplaceability), would you still think that legalizing robot marriage to humans is a terrible idea?

  • 想見中的未來金融

    想見中的未來金融

    今年的2020年,除了發生很多事情外,對於全人類來說都是個很重要的變動年,而且變好還是變壞,全憑個人的意志,但是絕對不能忽略的是,全人類的個人意願都是對這世界有不可或缺的影響,所有人,都是非常重要的一員。

    也許對曆史長河來說,人類的過程和結果都是一樣,但是對於微觀的我們個人來說,却是非常重要的。因為正在經歷這麼多事情的,都是我們自己啊。

    未來的我們,還應該留戀現在的金融體系嗎?

    我相信可預見的金融方式,將會與我們過去所認知的金融系統完全不一樣。我們不會再被玩弄,我們也不會再被騙,新的系統讓我們每一個人都平等面對資源,沒有誰可以用任何手法或數字去騙取世界的資源,還讓大家一直追逐莫名奇妙的數字走,而越來越遠離自己的夢想。

    還金融回歸資源的最初面貌,讓資源再次成為本來應該有的樣子。資源也是地球的一員,他們只是用他們的方式與人類社會及其他生物種社會進行互動,資源不是人類的專屬,是我們在短暫人生中的良好同伴,他們不應該再受到忽視。

    如果說計數很好就掌握資源我是不認同的,因為只會單一功能的人類根本沒有在地球上可以感到有什麼自豪的。

    這個世界因為有我們每一個人的存在,組成千絲萬縷的關係,漸漸織成了一張無形的網。我們在網的彼端互相聯繫,彼此感應大家的波動,沒有什麼比這種互動更讓我們感覺緊密相連。

    金融,也只不過是我們與世界資源互動中一種讓我們能夠理解的方式,但這種表現方式絕對不應該是我們過去所見到的樣子,毫無意義的數字追求也不應該是你的個人目標。

    總有天我們可以遇見,那想見的金融系統。

  • 2020年6月份的重要消息終於還是來了

    2020年6月份的重要消息終於還是來了

    今天為止6月過半,但各種意義重大的事件一件接一件的來。

    6月初的經濟事件(其實是政治影響經濟),讓很多港人將手中的資產重新評估。金融機構都有在關注起事件,甚至有人揚言集資枯空港幣。

    6月15日包子生日同時北京疫情大爆發。

    6月16日香港雙彩虹,有新寓意。同日,朝鮮自爆與南韓通訊的辦公室。同日,中印邊境軍隊談判不成反打架,印方聲明為中方先挑釁,造成人員死亡。

    6月17日,楊潔箎前往夏威夷與蓬佩奧談貿易。本來中方不願透露此事,不過美國國務院證實了此事。

    嗯,事情在向好的方面發展,期待。

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started