Category: Personal Share

最近好少出文章，今日突然間對一個問題感興趣。
到底加拿大白人，也就是主要來源於歐洲的族裔，有多少人口呢？
目前加拿大最近的人口普查，只有去到2021年的數據，但加拿大統計局於2022年10月26日才發布。但網站source到今日為止顯示最後修改時間為”2024-08-02″。
來源：Census Profile, 2021 Census of Population
這個table有個有趣的情況：加拿大的日本人都要比當時的香港人多，lol。
繼續了解一下加拿大歐洲裔主要來自哪幾個歐洲國家或族裔：
主要有英格蘭、愛爾蘭 、蘇格蘭、法裔、德裔等等。
2021年之後都有不少人口流動的情況，但以當年數據的人口為計，並且考慮到實際人口流動應該不大，所以於2021年的數據上，再繼續去了解一下以上五個歐洲裔主要來源的人口，主要集中於哪些地區。
數據未必精準，並且靠AI幫忙查找資料，我大概獲得的資料如下：

English（英格蘭裔）
英格蘭裔是加拿大最大族裔之一，在所有省份均非常普遍，在安大略省與卑詩省的比例特別高，英語系移民最常定居在都市化程度高的大城市。
可能比較集中的城市：
Toronto & GTA（Ontario）；Ottawa（Ontario）；Calgary（Alberta）；Vancouver（British Columbia）；Victoria（BC）…

Irish（愛爾蘭裔）
愛爾蘭裔在加拿大東部歷史深厚，特別在大西洋省份比例極高。在 Ontario 愛爾蘭裔人口數最多（因安省人口最大）。在新不倫瑞克 (New Brunswick)、紐芬蘭 Labrador、愛德華王子島 Love 等地非常常見。
可能比較集中的城市：
Toronto & GTA（Ontario）；Ottawa（Ontario）；Montréal（especially the West Island, which has more English-speaking areas）；Halifax（Nova Scotia）；St. John’s（Newfoundland & Labrador）…

Scottish（蘇格蘭裔）
蘇格蘭裔是加拿大第二大歐洲起源之一。早期大量移民定居在草原省份與大西洋省份。Alberta 與 BC 對蘇格蘭裔吸引力特別高，現代也有大量後代居住。
可能比較集中的城市：
Calgary（Alberta）；Edmonton（Alberta）；Toronto & GTA（Ontario）；Vancouver（BC）；Victoria（BC）；Halifax（Nova Scotia）…

French（法裔 / French origin）
法裔是加拿大除了英裔之外第二大的歐洲裔群體，其分佈非常集中，主要源於法國在新法蘭西（New France）的殖民歷史。法裔人口絕大多數集中在魁北克省 (Quebec)。New Brunswick 是加拿大唯一官方雙語省，法裔比例很高。
可能比較集中的城市：
Montréal（Quebec）；Québec City（Quebec）；Gatineau（Quebec）；Ottawa（Ontario）；Moncton（New Brunswick）；Fredericton（New Brunswick）…

German（德裔）
德裔是加拿大第四大歐洲裔群體，主要在三個時期進入加拿大：保皇黨時期、19世紀農耕時期和二戰後。主要集中地區： 草原省份 (Prairie Provinces) 和安大略省西南部。由於19世紀末20世紀初大量農耕移民的到來，德裔在加拿大西部的農村地區，當年特別是薩斯喀徹溫省 (Saskatchewan) 和亞伯塔省 (Alberta)，有很高的集中度。
可能比較集中的城市：
Winnipeg（Manitoba）；Edmonton（Alberta）；Calgary（Alberta）；Kitchener–Waterloo（Ontario）；Regina（Saskatchewan）；Saskatoon（Saskatchewan）…

The Jobs I See Emerging in an AI-Driven World

許多加拿大人似乎尚未完全意識到，AI所帶來的並不只是挑戰，更是創造工作與重塑生活方式的巨大契機。

Many Canadians seem to have not yet fully realized that AI brings more than just challenges—it offers vast opportunities to create new jobs and reshape our ways of living.

很多人對AI心存恐懼，擔心它會使我們變得冷漠、失去人性。然而事實恰恰相反：AI並不會決定我們是怎樣的人，而是我們對自身定位與選擇，將深刻影響AI如何在生活中扮演角色。

There is still fear surrounding AI, with some worried that it will make us cold and inhuman. But in fact, the opposite is true: AI doesn’t define who we are. Rather, our own sense of identity and the choices we make will shape how AI functions in our lives.

如果人類對自己的生活主導權採取消極態度，任由AI發展而不參與、不設計，那才是我們真正「自毀」的開始。

If humanity chooses a passive role and gives up control over its own future, allowing AI to develop without guidance or design, that would be the true beginning of self-destruction.

AI社會的基本架構假設

A Basic Framework for an AI-Integrated Society

未來若在加拿大廣泛導入AI，勢必伴隨著社會結構的改革。其中最核心的一環，是保障每個人有尊嚴地活著。

If AI is to be widely adopted in Canada, it will inevitably require structural changes in society. At the heart of this transformation is the need to guarantee a life of dignity for everyone.

這樣的基本生存權保障，包括日常住屋與基本飲食。要實現這一點，首先需要一群數學家與統計學家，精算出一個人在不同年齡、性別、健康條件下的基礎住房與食物需求，進而制定通用的計算模型與公式。

This includes basic rights to housing and food. To achieve this, we would first need mathematicians and statisticians to accurately calculate the minimum living requirements for individuals based on age, gender, and health conditions. These formulas would be programmed into AI systems to calculate each person’s daily basic survival allowance.

這個公式將輸入AI系統中，用以自動化計算每個人每日應得的「生存基數貨幣」。這筆貨幣將每日存入個人專屬的「生存帳戶」，僅用於支付基本房租與食物開支，不得用於其他消費。

This allowance would be deposited daily into an individual’s basic survival account, which could only be used for housing and essential food—not for other types of consumption.

透過這種制度，全國將能更有效地預估每年所需的房屋與農作物生產規模，進一步穩定生活物資供應，並減少浪費。這不只是保障弱勢，而是保障每一個人都可以有「不勞而活」的最低生活條件——不再為生存恐慌。

With such a system, the government could more effectively predict the annual demand for housing and agricultural production, thereby stabilizing supply and reducing waste. This wouldn’t just protect the vulnerable, but ensure that everyone has a minimum standard of life without the fear of survival.

那你可能會問：如果所有人生存都被保障了，誰還願意工作？

You might ask: if survival is guaranteed, who would still want to work?

這正是重點所在。

And that’s the key point.

當人不必為生存而工作，真正的勞動，將回歸「追求自我實現」、「為了更好的生活方式」而努力。人們將工作，是因為想要：

When people are no longer forced to work to survive, work itself transforms—it becomes a pursuit of self-fulfillment and a better quality of life. People will work because they want to:

• 吃得更好、住得更美
• Eat better, live more comfortably
• 有更豐富的娛樂與旅行體驗
• Enjoy richer entertainment and travel experiences
• 擁有社會地位、榮譽與意義感
• Gain social recognition, honor, and a sense of purpose
  

AI發展後的新型工作型態

New Types of Jobs in the Age of AI

那麼，AI發展起來之後，工作會變成什麼樣子呢？我以下舉幾個可能的變化方向，作為觀察與思考的出發點：

So what kinds of jobs might emerge in an AI-driven world? Here are a few possible directions as food for thought:

1. 高效率服務工作者

1. High-Efficiency Service Workers

服務業工作者將與AI與機器人協作，提高服務效率。例如，餐廳員工不再需要負責點餐、結帳等重複性工作，這些將由AI自動處理，人類則專注於與顧客的互動與解決問題。

Service industry workers will collaborate with AI and machines to increase efficiency. For example, restaurant staff may no longer need to take orders or handle payments—those tasks will be automated. Human workers will focus on customer interaction and resolving issues.

➡ ️ 工作人數可減少但服務量提升，工作更專業，不再依賴小費維生。

➡ ️ Fewer workers will be needed, but they’ll serve more customers with higher quality, and won’t need to rely on tips for income.

2. 情緒與人際交流專業

2. Emotional and Human Interaction Specialists

AI雖然強大，但難以真正理解與模擬人類情感。未來將需要更多擅長情緒管理、同理心、陪伴與心理協助的專業人才，如：

AI is powerful, but it still cannot truly replicate human emotions. Professionals skilled in emotional support, empathy, and psychological assistance will be increasingly valued. New roles may include:

• 情緒導師
• Emotional Coaches
• AI使用引導員
• AI Use Guides
• 人際訓練師
• Interpersonal Skills Trainers
  etc….

這些角色將幫助人們在人與AI的互動中找到平衡點，促進健康的人際關係與個人成長。

These roles will help people maintain healthy human connections and personal development in a world where AI is increasingly present.

3. AI倫理與治理專業

3. AI Ethics and Governance Professionals

AI社會需要被妥善管理與監督，未來將結合法律與政策背景的專業人士，發展出如下職業：

• AI倫理顧問
• AI Ethics Consultants
• 數據審查員
• Data Auditors
• 偏見防治工程師
• Bias Prevention Engineers

他們負責監控AI系統的決策過程，防止偏見與不公，確保AI技術遵守人類價值與社會原則。

They will monitor AI decision-making processes to ensure fairness and compliance with human values and societal norms.

4. 創意產業與人機共創人才

4. Creative Industries and Human-AI Co-Creation Roles

雖然AI可協助創作，但真正的靈感與敘事深度仍需人腦參與。未來創意工作者將成為AI的共同創作者，從事：

While AI can support creative processes, true inspiration and narrative depth still require the human mind. Future creative professionals will co-create with AI in areas such as:

• 音樂、藝術、小說等創作
• Music, art, and literature
• 遊戲設計與互動內容策劃
• Game design and interactive media
• 沉浸式敘事體驗設計
• Immersive storytelling and experience design
  

懂得如何整合AI能力與人類創意者，將是下一波熱門職業。

Those who can combine AI capabilities with human creativity will lead the next wave of innovation.

5. 智慧警務與即時判斷輔助

5. Smart Policing and Real-Time Decision Support

未來警察工作將結合AI與即時數據視覺化技術，獲得像「遊戲畫面」般的綜合資訊呈現，協助快速判斷與執行決策。提升處理效率與事件應變能力。

Law enforcement will integrate AI with real-time data visualization, offering a video-game-like interface for analyzing complex information and making quick decisions. This will enhance efficiency and improve response to emergencies.

6. 學習方式更多元、更個人化

6. More Diverse and Personalized Learning

AI將使學習資源更加個性化與即時化。學生可以快速找到合適導師，根據個人學習風格與目標制定計劃，學習也能更貼近實務應用，打破傳統教育模式的侷限。

AI will make learning more tailored and practical. Students will be able to quickly find suitable tutors and design learning paths based on their goals and learning styles. Education will move beyond traditional limitations, becoming more accessible and relevant.

不知道大家看完會有什麼想法，希望能夠在留言有看到感想。

I’m curious to know what others think after reading this. I hope to see some of your thoughts and reflections in the comments.

這個話題，一早就聽過網路上有人討論。我覺得他們說的都很有道理，例如他們有分析到酸民背後的心理因素，也有分享作為Youtube是如何面對酸民的行為給他們造成的影響。

This topic has been discussed online since early on. I think what people have said makes a lot of sense — for example, they analyzed the psychological factors behind internet trolls, and also shared how YouTubers cope with trolls and the impact their behavior has on them.

不過我比較想從小時候的一些行為，來解釋成年人為什麼會如此輕易對他人產生「葡萄是酸的」這種行為。

What I really want to explore is how certain behaviors we show as children might explain why, as adults, we sometimes dismiss or look down on things we secretly want but can’t have — kind of like the ‘sour grapes’ mentality.

回憶起小時候，我們都是會有妒忌別人的這種行為，但最初的心理層面是羨慕，而不是一開始的妒忌。但因為思索對方的持有物越來越多次的時候，漸漸羨慕的情緒就會變成妒忌。會不會因為這種情緒的升級而反映在行為上？很多時候我們會看自己是作出了哪些行為。

Thinking back to childhood, we all had moments when we felt jealous of others — but deep down, it often started as envy, not jealousy right away. When we reflect on it again and agai on what others have, envy can gradually turn into Jealousy. And that shift in emotion might manifest in our behavior. Yet we often recognize only the actions themselves, not the underlying emotions driving them.

我粗略地認為，小時候的心理缺失，假設是缺少物質的，就會是反映在成年後要更多的物質；假設是缺少關懷的，就會是反映在成年後要更多的關心，或者更容易向身邊的人情緒勒索。不過，因為細節上還是每個人的情況都不一樣，具體展現出的情況也會有不同。

Roughly speaking, I think psychological gaps from childhood can show up in different ways when we grow up. For example, if someone lacked material things as a child, they might seek more material possessions as an adult. If they lacked emotional care, they might crave more attention later on — or even resort to emotional manipulation with those around them. Of course, the details vary from person to person, so how these things manifest can look very different in each individual.

前面說的這些，是要想解釋，酸民這種行為，極有可能從根本上就能夠知道原因，只是因為隔了一層網路，人們不能面對面，就認為自己對他人不能夠了解。其實這種想法是對自我的限制。即使沒有了解到他人的細節，也不能看到對方的樣貌，我們在對自己了解之上，還是能從基本的原理去理解對方的。我們粗略地稱之為同理心，但實質上，我們還是能由理性的邏輯思考去解釋的。

What I’ve been trying to say is that the behavior of internet trolls might actually have very understandable roots. Just because there’s a screen between us — and we’re not face-to-face — people assume they can’t truly understand one another. But that belief is actually a limitation we place on ourselves.

Even if we don’t know all the details of someone’s life or can’t see their face, we can still make sense of their behavior by first understanding ourselves. There are fundamental principles we can use to interpret others. We often call this empathy — but in reality, we can also approach it through rational, logical thinking.

比如說，為什麼一個人會一直追蹤明星的動態？有些人覺得明星還自己感動，有些人覺得明星還自己無聊的人生有事可做，有些人覺得明星娛樂了自己(把對方想像成有趣的朋友)，有些人覺得這是商業機會(可以吸引到追蹤明星的粉絲)，有些人想要獲得朋友的認同感受(想像喜歡這類型明星的人，應該是能夠與自己產生共鳴的)。我想舉這個例子是因為這樣大家就比較能理解，其實把人的感情因素投射出去之後，就能作出一定的分析。這也是社交媒體網路上的演算法分析的基礎邏輯。

For example, why does someone constantly follow a celebrity’s updates?
Some people feel emotionally moved by the celebrity. Some find that following them gives their otherwise boring life a sense of excitement or something to focus on. Others see the celebrity as a source of entertainment — like imagining them as an interesting friend.

Some view it as a business opportunity — a way to attract the celebrity’s fans for their own gain. Others are simply seeking a sense of social belonging, believing that people who like this kind of celebrity might resonate with them on a deeper level.

I bring up this example because it helps people better understand that when we project our emotional needs outward, those actions can be analyzed in meaningful ways. In fact, this is the core logic behind how algorithms on social media platforms operate — they analyze the emotional and behavioral patterns people express online.

所以，同樣道理的，酸民的行為，除了有商業性質的打手疑慮外，也有很多個人的因素包括在當中。我們的網路生活其實也是與我們實際人生遇到的情況有千絲萬縷的關係，不可能因為網路是虛擬的就能夠另當別論。在網路上的行為，就像是在馬路上遊走一般，所有行為還是會有蹤跡可尋的。酸民的行為也是一樣。

Similarly, when it comes to the behavior of internet trolls, aside from the possibility of commercial interests or “paid attackers,” there are also many personal factors at play. Our online lives are deeply intertwined with the real-life situations we face — it’s impossible to treat the virtual world as something completely separate from reality.

The actions we take online are like walking down a street — every action leaves a trace. Trolls’ behaviors are no different.

作為一個網路居民，當你踏入網路的時候，還是要小心過馬路。從最基本的認識自己，才能更好地掌握自己的人生，而不是輕易地就被操控行為。

As a citizen of the internet, once you step into the online world, you still need to watch your step — just like crossing the street.

It all starts with understanding yourself. Only then can you truly take control of your life, instead of letting your actions be easily manipulated by outside forces.

這裡不是想討論宗教問題，也不挑戰任何現有的權威發表，只是單純表達個人所獲得的靈感。
很多人都知道聖經創世紀當中的亞當和夏娃，是吃了禁果才會開始了一系列後續的故事。
想從一個科幻愛好的角度去看待這一件事，嘗試做一點分析。

為何上帝告知若亞當和夏娃，吃了知識樹的果實，他們就會死？
從邏輯上分析，從相反的角度去看: 如果不吃知識樹的果實，亞當和夏娃就不會經歷死亡。
由此，我們可知，或假設，上帝創造的生命，其靈能高度可以使其不滅。無法得知其狀態，但肯定的是，「不會經歷死亡」這一點是存在的理論。
因此，從目前所已知的對生命的理解，以及從不同宗教對靈魂的解讀或描述所獲得的較為貼近科學角度的解釋：肉體，靈，魂，是分開的組成部分; 另外，維度或境界是靈魂活動的範圍，有分層次。

從這個理論延伸出的情況去解釋：當亞當和夏娃吃了知識樹的果實，他們很有可能是靈魂的維度或境界被降低，然後塞進了符合那個維度或境界的知識。正因為靈魂的質被改變了，自然就會不能符合繼續生活在那個環境。同時，他們不能再操作上帝交付的工作。雖然沒有任何證據，但理論上人是需要符合資格才能進行某種工作，假如因為意外而失去某種資格，已經不是公司想留下人才，這個人就能留下。
而事實上，聖經也只提及到他們被趕出了伊甸園，但應該連同他們的肉體。
因此，想大膽假設他們是靈魂的維度被改寫了，也同時失去了被指定的資格，所以被趕出工作的地方。

如果能夠理解上述純邏輯的分析，自然就不難理解，為何魔鬼作為墮落天使，要化身為蛇—-或操縱蛇身去引誘亞當和夏娃去吃知識樹的果實。
因此，知識樹的果實是一種超越目前層次的理解之上，只有當我們的靈魂維度被提升到更高層次，才能夠理解一二。
雖然聖經沒有特別提到，但上帝未創造天地之前，世界本是所有一切皆為一體。創造世界這件事，可能的假設就是，將同類型的東西歸類在一起，光與暗被分開，物質各樣被給予了規律，才會得以有所循序發展。

還是回到為何不能吃知識樹的果實這個主題。
假設知識樹是上帝的一項研究結果，是研究魂的質的維度變化，那麼蛇是已知這樹上果實的特質，利用了樹上的果實的特質，去騙無知的夏娃。再利用亞當對夏娃的信任，將兩位由上帝親手創造的特別存在的資格奪去。
基於壞人都傾向隱藏身份，因此蛇可能只是這位產生妒忌心的天使操縱的形象，目的是為了當亞當或夏娃告知上帝時，也不能立即查出主謀。
為何生命樹旁邊要有一棵知識樹？假設伊甸園就是上帝投放新生命到星球上之前的實驗室，那麼，這一切就非常合理。生命樹和知識樹就是軟體，為物質世界注入靈和魂的存在。

當我們的電腦被安裝不適當的較體，清除掉是一件很容易的事情；但靈魂却未必是這樣。
假設亞當和夏娃本來安裝的只有聖靈的生命樹及知識樹版本的軟體，但因為受到誘惑而安裝了獸與動物版本的知識樹的軟體。這樣兩種不同版本軟體存在於同一具肉體，以我們人類目前認知的角度，就如一個會突然情緒爆怒的精神患者，未知何時會造成他人的傷害。

所以結論就是，本來就不應該吃知識樹的果實。因為你不知道是什麼版本，還很可能對你來說是一種病毒。作為研究室的工作人員應該要有嚴謹的守規矩意識，不然是怎麼死的都不知道。

Why Is It Forbidden to Eat the Fruit of the Tree of Knowledge?
This discussion is not about religious debate, nor is it meant to challenge any established authority. It is simply an expression of personal inspiration.
Many people are familiar with the story from Genesis in the Bible, where Adam and Eve eat the forbidden fruit, triggering a series of subsequent events. Looking at this from a science fiction enthusiast’s perspective, I want to explore this idea further.

這裡不是想討論宗教問題，也不挑戰任何現有的權威發表，只是單純表達個人所獲得的靈感。

很多人都知道聖經創世紀當中的亞當和夏娃，是吃了禁果才會開始了一系列後續的故事。

想從一個科幻愛好的角度去看待這一件事，嘗試做一點分析。

為何上帝告知若亞當和夏娃，吃了知識樹的果實，他們就會死？

從邏輯上分析，從相反的角度去看: 如果不吃知識樹的果實，亞當和夏娃就不會經歷死亡。

由此，我們可知，或假設，上帝創造的生命，其靈能高度可以使其不滅。無法得知其狀態，但肯定的是，「不會經歷死亡」這一點是存在的理論。

因此，從目前所已知的對生命的理解，以及從不同宗教對靈魂的解讀或描述所獲得的較為貼近科學角度的解釋：肉體，靈，魂，是分開的組成部分; 另外，維度或境界是靈魂活動的範圍，有分層次。

從這個理論延伸出的情況去解釋：當亞當和夏娃吃了知識樹的果實，他們很有可能是靈魂的維度或境界被降低，然後塞進了符合那個維度或境界的知識。正因為靈魂的質被改變了，自然就會不能符合繼續生活在那個環境。同時，他們不能再操作上帝交付的工作。雖然沒有任何證據，但理論上人是需要符合資格才能進行某種工作，假如因為意外而失去某種資格，已經不是公司想留下人才，這個人就能留下。

而事實上，聖經也只提及到他們被趕出了伊甸園，但應該連同他們的肉體。

因此，想大膽假設他們是靈魂的維度被改寫了，也同時失去了被指定的資格，所以被趕出工作的地方。

如果能夠理解上述純邏輯的分析，自然就不難理解，為何魔鬼作為墮落天使，要化身為蛇—-或操縱蛇身去引誘亞當和夏娃去吃知識樹的果實。

因此，知識樹的果實是一種超越目前層次的理解之上，只有當我們的靈魂維度被提升到更高層次，才能夠理解一二。

雖然聖經沒有特別提到，但上帝未創造天地之前，世界本是所有一切皆為一體。創造世界這件事，可能的假設就是，將同類型的東西歸類在一起，光與暗被分開，物質各樣被給予了規律，才會得以有所循序發展。

還是回到為何不能吃知識樹的果實這個主題。

假設知識樹是上帝的一項研究結果，是研究魂的質的維度變化，那麼蛇是已知這樹上果實的特質，利用了樹上的果實的特質，去騙無知的夏娃。再利用亞當對夏娃的信任，將兩位由上帝親手創造的特別存在的資格奪去。

基於壞人都傾向隱藏身份，因此蛇可能只是這位產生妒忌心的天使操縱的形象，目的是為了當亞當或夏娃告知上帝時，也不能立即查出主謀。

為何生命樹旁邊要有一棵知識樹？假設伊甸園就是上帝投放新生命到星球上之前的實驗室，那麼，這一切就非常合理。生命樹和知識樹就是軟體，為物質世界注入靈和魂的存在。

當我們的電腦被安裝不適當的較體，清除掉是一件很容易的事情；但靈魂却未必是這樣。

假設亞當和夏娃本來安裝的只有聖靈的生命樹及知識樹版本的軟體，但因為受到誘惑而安裝了獸與動物版本的知識樹的軟體。這樣兩種不同版本軟體存在於同一具肉體，以我們人類目前認知的角度，就如一個會突然情緒爆怒的精神患者，未知何時會造成他人的傷害。

所以結論就是，本來就不應該吃知識樹的果實。因為你不知道是什麼版本，還很可能對你來說是一種病毒。作為研究室的工作人員應該要有嚴謹的守規矩意識，不然是怎麼死的都不知道。

Why Is It Forbidden to Eat the Fruit of the Tree of Knowledge?

This discussion is not about religious debate, nor is it meant to challenge any established authority. It is simply an expression of personal inspiration.

Many people are familiar with the story from Genesis in the Bible, where Adam and Eve eat the forbidden fruit, triggering a series of subsequent events. Looking at this from a science fiction enthusiast’s perspective, I want to explore this idea further.

Why Did God Warn That Eating the Fruit Would Lead to Death?

Logically analyzing it from the opposite perspective: If Adam and Eve had not eaten the fruit, they would not have experienced death. From this, we can infer or hypothesize that the beings created by God possessed a spiritual energy so profound that they were immortal. While we cannot determine their exact nature, the theoretical premise remains—”they would not experience death.”

Based on our current understanding of life and interpretations of the soul in various religions, we can consider this idea from a more scientific perspective: the body, spirit, and soul are distinct components. Additionally, dimensions or realms define the scope of the soul’s activity, with different levels of existence.

The Consequences of Eating the Fruit

Building on this theory, when Adam and Eve ate the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge, their soul’s dimension or realm may have been lowered, forcing them into a state that aligned with this new, lower dimension. Since the nature of their souls had changed, they could no longer exist in their original environment. At the same time, they were no longer qualified to carry out the tasks assigned to them by God.

Although there is no direct evidence, theoretically, certain roles require specific qualifications. If someone loses their qualification—whether due to accident or circumstance—then no matter how much an organization values their talent, they simply can no longer stay in that position.

In reality, the Bible only states that Adam and Eve were expelled from the Garden of Eden, and it is likely that this expulsion included their physical bodies as well. Therefore, we can boldly hypothesize that their soul’s dimension was rewritten, causing them to lose their designated status and be cast out from their original place of work.

The Role of the Serpent

If we accept this logical analysis, it becomes easier to understand why the devil, as a fallen angel, chose to appear as a serpent—or manipulated the serpent—to tempt Adam and Eve into eating the fruit.

The fruit of the Tree of Knowledge represents an understanding that surpasses their current level of awareness. Only when the soul’s dimension is elevated can one fully comprehend its nature.

Although the Bible does not explicitly state this, before God created the heavens and the earth, everything existed as one unified whole. The act of creation may have been an attempt to categorize and order the universe—separating light from darkness, giving structure to matter—allowing the world to develop in a systematic way.

Why Was Eating the Fruit Forbidden?

If we assume that the Tree of Knowledge was the result of God’s research into the transformation of the soul’s dimensional properties, then the serpent, aware of the fruit’s characteristics, exploited this knowledge to deceive the unsuspecting Eve. It then leveraged Adam’s trust in Eve to strip them both of their unique status as beings personally created by God.

Since deceivers tend to hide their true identity, the serpent may have been nothing more than a vessel manipulated by a jealous angel seeking to undermine Adam and Eve. This would also explain why, when they reported the incident to God, the true mastermind was not immediately revealed.

The Tree of Life and the Tree of Knowledge

Why was the Tree of Knowledge placed next to the Tree of Life? If we assume that the Garden of Eden was God’s laboratory for testing new life before placing it on Earth, then everything starts to make sense. The Tree of Life and the Tree of Knowledge functioned like software—programs designed to inject spirit and soul into the material world.

When we install an incompatible program on a computer, it is relatively easy to remove it. However, the soul does not work the same way. If Adam and Eve were originally “installed” with only the Holy Spirit’s version of the Tree of Life and the Tree of Knowledge, but then, due to temptation, they installed a different version—one aligned with animals and beasts—then these two conflicting systems coexisting within the same body could cause unpredictable effects.

From our current understanding, this would resemble someone suffering from extreme mood swings or a mental disorder, potentially posing a danger to others.

Conclusion

The fruit of the Tree of Knowledge should never have been eaten. You never know which version you are consuming, and it could very well be a virus. Those working in a research lab must adhere to strict regulations; otherwise, they might unknowingly bring about their own downfall.這裡不是想討論宗教問題，也不挑戰任何現有的權威發表，只是單純表達個人所獲得的靈感。
很多人都知道聖經創世紀當中的亞當和夏娃，是吃了禁果才會開始了一系列後續的故事。
想從一個科幻愛好的角度去看待這一件事，嘗試做一點分析。

為何上帝告知若亞當和夏娃，吃了知識樹的果實，他們就會死？
從邏輯上分析，從相反的角度去看: 如果不吃知識樹的果實，亞當和夏娃就不會經歷死亡。
由此，我們可知，或假設，上帝創造的生命，其靈能高度可以使其不滅。無法得知其狀態，但肯定的是，「不會經歷死亡」這一點是存在的理論。
因此，從目前所已知的對生命的理解，以及從不同宗教對靈魂的解讀或描述所獲得的較為貼近科學角度的解釋：肉體，靈，魂，是分開的組成部分; 另外，維度或境界是靈魂活動的範圍，有分層次。

從這個理論延伸出的情況去解釋：當亞當和夏娃吃了知識樹的果實，他們很有可能是靈魂的維度或境界被降低，然後塞進了符合那個維度或境界的知識。正因為靈魂的質被改變了，自然就會不能符合繼續生活在那個環境。同時，他們不能再操作上帝交付的工作。雖然沒有任何證據，但理論上人是需要符合資格才能進行某種工作，假如因為意外而失去某種資格，已經不是公司想留下人才，這個人就能留下。
而事實上，聖經也只提及到他們被趕出了伊甸園，但應該連同他們的肉體。
因此，想大膽假設他們是靈魂的維度被改寫了，也同時失去了被指定的資格，所以被趕出工作的地方。

如果能夠理解上述純邏輯的分析，自然就不難理解，為何魔鬼作為墮落天使，要化身為蛇—-或操縱蛇身去引誘亞當和夏娃去吃知識樹的果實。
因此，知識樹的果實是一種超越目前層次的理解之上，只有當我們的靈魂維度被提升到更高層次，才能夠理解一二。
雖然聖經沒有特別提到，但上帝未創造天地之前，世界本是所有一切皆為一體。創造世界這件事，可能的假設就是，將同類型的東西歸類在一起，光與暗被分開，物質各樣被給予了規律，才會得以有所循序發展。

還是回到為何不能吃知識樹的果實這個主題。
假設知識樹是上帝的一項研究結果，是研究魂的質的維度變化，那麼蛇是已知這樹上果實的特質，利用了樹上的果實的特質，去騙無知的夏娃。再利用亞當對夏娃的信任，將兩位由上帝親手創造的特別存在的資格奪去。
基於壞人都傾向隱藏身份，因此蛇可能只是這位產生妒忌心的天使操縱的形象，目的是為了當亞當或夏娃告知上帝時，也不能立即查出主謀。
為何生命樹旁邊要有一棵知識樹？假設伊甸園就是上帝投放新生命到星球上之前的實驗室，那麼，這一切就非常合理。生命樹和知識樹就是軟體，為物質世界注入靈和魂的存在。

當我們的電腦被安裝不適當的較體，清除掉是一件很容易的事情；但靈魂却未必是這樣。
假設亞當和夏娃本來安裝的只有聖靈的生命樹及知識樹版本的軟體，但因為受到誘惑而安裝了獸與動物版本的知識樹的軟體。這樣兩種不同版本軟體存在於同一具肉體，以我們人類目前認知的角度，就如一個會突然情緒爆怒的精神患者，未知何時會造成他人的傷害。

所以結論就是，本來就不應該吃知識樹的果實。因為你不知道是什麼版本，還很可能對你來說是一種病毒。作為研究室的工作人員應該要有嚴謹的守規矩意識，不然是怎麼死的都不知道。

Why Is It Forbidden to Eat the Fruit of the Tree of Knowledge?
This discussion is not about religious debate, nor is it meant to challenge any established authority. It is simply an expression of personal inspiration.
Many people are familiar with the story from Genesis in the Bible, where Adam and Eve eat the forbidden fruit, triggering a series of subsequent events. Looking at this from a science fiction enthusiast’s perspective, I want to explore this idea further.

Why Did God Warn That Eating the Fruit Would Lead to Death?
Logically analyzing it from the opposite perspective: If Adam and Eve had not eaten the fruit, they would not have experienced death. From this, we can infer or hypothesize that the beings created by God possessed a spiritual energy so profound that they were immortal. While we cannot determine their exact nature, the theoretical premise remains—”they would not experience death.”
Based on our current understanding of life and interpretations of the soul in various religions, we can consider this idea from a more scientific perspective: the body, spirit, and soul are distinct components. Additionally, dimensions or realms define the scope of the soul’s activity, with different levels of existence.

The Consequences of Eating the Fruit
Building on this theory, when Adam and Eve ate the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge, their soul’s dimension or realm may have been lowered, forcing them into a state that aligned with this new, lower dimension. Since the nature of their souls had changed, they could no longer exist in their original environment. At the same time, they were no longer qualified to carry out the tasks assigned to them by God.
Although there is no direct evidence, theoretically, certain roles require specific qualifications. If someone loses their qualification—whether due to accident or circumstance—then no matter how much an organization values their talent, they simply can no longer stay in that position.
In reality, the Bible only states that Adam and Eve were expelled from the Garden of Eden, and it is likely that this expulsion included their physical bodies as well. Therefore, we can boldly hypothesize that their soul’s dimension was rewritten, causing them to lose their designated status and be cast out from their original place of work.

The Role of the Serpent
If we accept this logical analysis, it becomes easier to understand why the devil, as a fallen angel, chose to appear as a serpent—or manipulated the serpent—to tempt Adam and Eve into eating the fruit.
The fruit of the Tree of Knowledge represents an understanding that surpasses their current level of awareness. Only when the soul’s dimension is elevated can one fully comprehend its nature.
Although the Bible does not explicitly state this, before God created the heavens and the earth, everything existed as one unified whole. The act of creation may have been an attempt to categorize and order the universe—separating light from darkness, giving structure to matter—allowing the world to develop in a systematic way.

Why Was Eating the Fruit Forbidden?
If we assume that the Tree of Knowledge was the result of God’s research into the transformation of the soul’s dimensional properties, then the serpent, aware of the fruit’s characteristics, exploited this knowledge to deceive the unsuspecting Eve. It then leveraged Adam’s trust in Eve to strip them both of their unique status as beings personally created by God.
Since deceivers tend to hide their true identity, the serpent may have been nothing more than a vessel manipulated by a jealous angel seeking to undermine Adam and Eve. This would also explain why, when they reported the incident to God, the true mastermind was not immediately revealed.

The Tree of Life and the Tree of Knowledge
Why was the Tree of Knowledge placed next to the Tree of Life? If we assume that the Garden of Eden was God’s laboratory for testing new life before placing it on Earth, then everything starts to make sense. The Tree of Life and the Tree of Knowledge functioned like software—programs designed to inject spirit and soul into the material world.
When we install an incompatible program on a computer, it is relatively easy to remove it. However, the soul does not work the same way. If Adam and Eve were originally “installed” with only the Holy Spirit’s version of the Tree of Life and the Tree of Knowledge, but then, due to temptation, they installed a different version—one aligned with animals and beasts—then these two conflicting systems coexisting within the same body could cause unpredictable effects.
From our current understanding, this would resemble someone suffering from extreme mood swings or a mental disorder, potentially posing a danger to others.

Conclusion
The fruit of the Tree of Knowledge should never have been eaten. You never know which version you are consuming, and it could very well be a virus. Those working in a research lab must adhere to strict regulations; otherwise, they might unknowingly bring about their own downfall.

人類自我意識的覺醒的重要性(The Importance of the Awakening of Human Self-Consciousness)

人類有各種自認為能代表自己的意識，但都只是對各種事物的情緒及反應，那都只是表層的條件反應，支持我們運作的從身體基因上積累的數據而作出的條件式。
意識是更高階的事情。或者更深層次的事情。

Humans often believe they possess self-awareness, but what they typically experience are just emotional reactions and responses to various stimuli—surface-level conditioned reactions shaped by the accumulated data within our body and genes. True consciousness operates on a higher, or perhaps deeper, level.

當貓狗看見鏡中的自己時，那只是發現了「自我」，但並不代表他們能明白意識的存在。
意識的存在，是聯結我們的「過去」「現在」「未來」，也是我們彼此之間的聯結。

When cats and dogs see their reflections, they may recognize the concept of “self,” but this recognition does not equate to an understanding of consciousness. Consciousness connects our “past,” “present,” and “future,” and it also serves as a link between us as individuals.

曾經有一個很哲理的問題：
假如一個人從頭到尾更換了整個身體，這個人還是原來的那個人嗎？
不是。但他的意識很可能還是他的。
科學界的假設性問題：
複製人。被複製的那個人還是跟本人一樣嗎？
不是。因為我們已知雙胞胎也有不一樣的人生。
但有更大膽的人開始假設複製的意識或記憶。因為我們正在要行經所有與AI有關的一切，無論是結果如何的過程。

A philosophical question has long been pondered:
If a person were to completely replace their body from head to toe, would they still be the same person?
The answer is no. However, their consciousness might still remain intact.
A scientific hypothetical question:
If a human were cloned, would the clone be identical to the original person?
The answer is no. We know that even identical twins lead different lives.
Yet, some daringly hypothesize the possibility of replicating consciousness or memory. This line of thought is particularly relevant as we explore the implications of AI, regardless of the outcomes.

靈魂是「意識」的承載體，意識才是蒲公英當中最重要的「原子」。
一個人無視自己的「核心」價值，就如同一輛載滿乘客的車，但正在使用無人駕駛功能；或者甚至沒有無人駕駛功能，只是進行低能量消耗的無目標遊離。

The soul serves as the vessel for “consciousness,” and consciousness is the most crucial “atom” within this vessel, akin to a dandelion. Ignoring one’s “core” values is like driving a car filled with passengers using an autonomous driving system—or even without one—just aimlessly drifting to conserve energy.

聖經中的創世紀，一開始便說明了，神最初創造了光這一個重要的載體。
物理學上也發現，光在有意識觀察的影響下，會變得有規律。
光速的不變，正因為距離(空間)就是光本身，而時間不存在。時間是意識對熵增過程的理解而產生的衝量。但如果沒有時間的測量，我們就無法「有意識」地作出比較和進行規律的運作。

In the Book of Genesis, it is stated that God first created light, a crucial vessel. Physics also reveals that light, when observed with consciousness, behaves in a structured manner. The constancy of the speed of light is due to the fact that space itself is light, and time does not exist independently. Time is an impulse generated by our understanding of the entropy increase process. Without the measurement of time, we cannot make “conscious” comparisons or operate in an orderly manner.

當你的「核心」價值被自己重視起來的時候，你才會真正的明白「意識」對於人類的重要性，也才能真正很好地理解「自己」的各種聯結。
有「意識」到的人，最容易有的感覺就是自己「被光包圍」，而沒有「意識」到的人，最容易有的感覺就是「被黑暗吞噬」。

When you truly value your “core” values, you will begin to understand the significance of “consciousness” for humanity and comprehend the various connections that define “self.” Those who are “conscious” often feel enveloped by light, while those who are not “conscious” often feel engulfed by darkness.

#多倫多旅遊攻略 #TorontoTravel #FamilyTravelingToronto #PlayinToronto #一家大細去遊多倫多

首先如果你一家大細喺指有老人家同細路仔，建議可以搭公共交通去downtown以下地點:

地點1 : #AquariumToronto 即喺水族館，個人感受唔喺好值呢個錢 (價錢Click入碌落去)，但帶細路去放電可以選擇去附近，買唔買票入去睇，邊幾個入去睇就自己決定。場館唔大，喺濃縮版香港海洋公園，唔好對顏值有太大期望，但如果細路要噃學識朋友仔，咁就應該要去吓。

好多人會同你講去電視塔附近，電視塔同水族館其實挨埋好近，入門費都好貴，但唔確定有冇本地身份第一次優惠。但對面馬路有個公園(Roundhouse Park)，四季都可以去，不過冬天室外活動去唔去就自己衡量。公園有個好似工廠外表之建築，入面有一間舒適餐廳同需要你大撒幣之室內遊樂場，帶細路去玩之前自己衡量下。

如果電視塔腳下底冇咩玩，行出去大湖邊有幾個唔算大但都好有文化歷史氣氛之公園，例如Harbourfront Centre 同旁邊幾個Park，睇地圖會見到位置。

以上介紹就比較Downtown Centre同埋需要消費之區域，仲有其他如Scotiabank Arena (中文叫加拿大航空中心，銀行贊助而建)，喺運動中心，有個Food Court，不過出入口好容易令初初去到之遊客迷路，唔識路要問Police同Google Map啦，附近都比較雜，自己注意財不露及人身安全。

地點2 :#HighPark 即喺中文地圖海柏公園。同名地鐵出入口附近有幾間Cafe，又有藥店同公共圖書館，去之前查好位置，帶同老人家時可以自由選擇，安排好行程，因為公園都唔細，腳骨力唔好要睇自己程度。

公園之功能性都好多。因為種好多櫻花，春季去可以賞櫻，就算冬季去都喺一個好選擇。園內有Cafe有兒童遊樂場(所有公園都不含電動遊樂設施，並且免費)，有個細動物園，設有幾種溫和動物。都夠一家大細行吓停吓，又食吓玩吓都至少半日消磨去。

(多倫多賞櫻地圖，來自網絡: 賞櫻介紹)

加拿大好多公園，當你習慣之後你就會明白公園之重要性。一家大細要出去玩得開心，都唔需要吓吓使錢，健康同安全及親近自然，睇落唔使錢先喺最貴嘅無價寶，睇落以為無咩做，但可能從中穫得靈感同舒緩，同時可以進行親子活動及教育。

地點3 :#NiagaraFall 尼亞加拉 瀑布城。喺多倫多生活咗一排而冇去過睇瀑布好似差緊少少嘢，你可以去紐約同布魯克林，然後感受紙醉金迷同金錢之藝術文化，但Niagara Fall城之感受比較緩和，衝擊感冇咁大，而且行程為一日之內，你唔需要給付貴價酒店之費用，又可以帶住一家人去”敗金”。主要街道為Clifton Hill 加上Victoria Ave，一家人可以好Chill地”敗金”。仲有觀瀑塔Skylon Tower可以選擇，當你想”獨”享瀑布去影相。去之前要上網查好當日你想去之設施之開放時間，避免摸門釘。自己揸車去要睇日子，假日都好多人好多車，搭旅遊巴去就要睇好時間安排行程。

去到個感受都冇咩特別，如果你回想起過大海去澳門，可能個感受喺差唔多，不過就唔喺夜繽紛，而喺”瀑繽紛”，唔知大家中意睇有顏色之瀑布，還是有顏色之夜市呢？

如果去到可能好夜又驚貴，可以喺Walmart買定熟食再去，當一家人去野餐，不過記得帶走垃圾同處理好。揸車人士，來去旅途都可以自行選擇落HighWay去農莊買紅酒，途中你會睇到好多牌，去之前都可以查清楚。

去完一程，可能你會搵到之前嗰”差少少”。

I watched a video recently and the topic was, do you find a relationship with someone who really understands you and has the same interests, or do you find someone who is different from you to make the relationship full of sparks? I believe that no matter which choice there is, there is no right or wrong. Your choice only reflects your needs, and it may be that your perspective on things is different due to your different growth stages, so you have no way to judge yourself at that moment. Right and wrong, unless you really know yourself.

So if even the boss of a company doesn’t know what kind of company their company is going to become, or is confused about where their company will go in the future, I really doubt why they feel that their subordinates will make their company more and more prosperous. the better. So he can only be a boss, not a leader. This can also explain why big companies need a CEO, but the boss retreats behind the scenes and becomes a shareholder. A boss who really knows how to let go is actually very powerful.

Therefore, if the boss of a growing company is always looking for talents based on the recommendations of people they think they can trust, do they really have such a unique vision to know what kind of talents they need to hire? There is no distinction between right and wrong. But what is certain is that a company that only looks for the “same” will only show a single gene in talents, just like many people with genetic defects, they will only grow into strange appearances.

Like cats, the purer the breed, the more prone to genetic diseases.

If you continue to obsessively ask for people who are 100 points in your ideals, you may never find those teams that make your company grow, and your dreams and ideals will stop here.

我最近看了一段影片，話題是說你要找到真正理解你並且要有相同興趣的人談戀愛，還是找跟你不一樣的人來讓這段戀情充滿火花？我相信無論哪種選擇都是沒有對錯的，你的選擇只是反映了你的需求，而且可能只是你成長階段的不同導致你對事情的看法不一樣，所以你那一刻沒有辦法去判斷自己是否做得對與錯，除非你真正地認識了自己。

所以一家公司如果連老闆都不知道自己的公司要成為怎樣的公司的時候，或者是對自己公司將來要去哪裡感到迷惑的時候，我真的很懷疑為什麼他們會覺得自己的手下會讓他們的公司好起來。所以他只會是老闆而不是領導者，也就能解釋為什麼大公司都需要CEO，而老闆退到幕後當股東。真正懂得什麼時候放手的老闆其實都很厲害。

因此，如果一家成長中的公司，老闆總是根據自認為信得過的人的推薦而尋找人才的時候，他們真的有這樣獨特的眼光知道自己需要請的是怎樣的人才嗎？是沒有對錯的分別。不過可以肯定的是一家只找”相同”的公司只會在人才的基因上呈現單一，就跟很多的基因缺陷的人一樣，只會成長成奇怪的樣子。

像貓貓一樣，越是純種越是容易基因生病。

如果你繼續沉迷要請的人是你理想中100分的人，可能你永遠也不會找到那些讓你公司成長的團隊，你的夢想和理想也就直接到此為止吧。